Vultr vs Linode: Global Reach Compared
Vultr and Linode are both excellent developer VPS providers. Vultr leads on global locations and bare metal; Linode (now Akamai) leads on CDN integration and email-ready accounts.
Head-to-Head Comparison
| Feature | VU | LN |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | $30/account | ✓$25/account |
| Global Locations | ✓32 data centers | 11 data centers |
| Bare Metal | ✓Yes | No |
| Port 25 Available | No | ✓Yes (Port 25 Open) |
| CDN | Separate | ✓Akamai (integrated) |
| GPU Instances | Yes (Cloud GPU) | Yes |
| NVMe Performance | ✓High-frequency | Standard NVMe |
| Object Storage | Yes | Yes (S3-compatible) |
Our Verdict
Vultr is best for: maximum global coverage (32 locations), bare metal, high-frequency compute, and globally distributed game servers.
View VU Accounts →Linode is best for: Akamai CDN integration, port 25 email servers, slightly lower pricing, and straightforward S3-compatible storage.
View LN Accounts →Top VU Accounts
Vultr $200 Credit
- All Regions Access
- 7 Days Replacement
- 30min–12hr Delivery
Vultr $250 Credit
- Cloud/Bare Metal
- Worldwide Working
- 24/7 Support
Vultr $300 Credit
- All Services Access
- 7 Days Replacement
- 30min–12hr Delivery
Top LN Accounts
FAQs
Which has more global locations?
Vultr, with 32 data centers vs Linode's 11. For deploying close to users worldwide, Vultr offers far more coverage.
Which is better for email?
Linode — our Linode Port 25 Open accounts are pre-approved for SMTP. Vultr does not offer port 25 accounts on Cloudrix.
Does Linode include a CDN?
Yes. Since the Akamai acquisition, Linode accounts can leverage Akamai's global CDN — a real advantage for content-heavy workloads.